#WARGAMING GAME CENTER LAUNCH AT START SERIES#

Rather, if we categorize these efforts very generally, we note that one major use of wargaming is to examine what concepts, ideas, capabilities, or doctrines appear to have utility given a range of alternative futures, particularly for emerging or not-yet-fielded platforms and weapons. An attempt to develop a typology of wargaming would be quite complicated, however, and that is not our purpose here. The Basic and Applied Research of Wargaming Wargaming is an established and time-honored mechanism through which proposed defense concepts, doctrine, and tactics are explored, and there is a rich literature that describes its uses and applications. Search for basic understanding of the future of war is coupled with the application and testing of these understandings in a joint arena. Our thesis is that wargaming will fail to meet the expectations of US defense planners unless the Wargames frequently have been compressed into service-specific views and repertoires so that they validate, rather than challenge, current operational procedures and priorities. All too often the outputs of wargames have been limited to their training value, or have been skewed because the players were allowed to take the future where they wanted it to go. But they must also reflect the realities of joint battlefields. must make decisions regarding the use of force in the context of a future conflict scenario') and experimental exercises, it is important that those simulations seek basic truths about future military operations.

In that response, he termed wargames a 'critical tool for ensuring senior decisionmakers, joint force commanders, and their staffs are able to maximize 21stcentury warfighting capabilities.' As the nation embarks on a course of wargaming (defined in the 1999 Secretary of Defense's Annual Report to the President and the Congress as 'carefully constructed simulations in which experienced civilian and military players.

Both reports also recognize the importance of using wargames and experimentation to explore the military doctrines, operational concepts, and organizational arrangements needed to take advantage of the emerging RMA, as well as to develop and test 'concepts and capabilities that will ensure the ability to transform for the future.' To assure Congress that his department had such work already under way, Secretary of Defense William Cohen, in a response to the NDP, described the number and variety of 'transformation activities' that DOD has undertaken to improve understanding of the future security environment. Both studies note the tension between managing near-term threats and preparing to meet longer-term challenges, suggesting that there will be considerable pulling and hauling over the next few years as defense priorities and funding are manipulated to meet those competing needs. The NDP adopted a longer-range view, called for additional funding to support a 'transformation strategy' that would enable a 'revolution in military affairs' (RMA), and questioned the future and rationale of certain major DOD programs. The QDR took a relatively short-term look, expanded the scope of DOD's Bottom-Up Review (BUR), and kept major programs and budget projections essentially on track. Despite congressional hopes that the QDR and NDP might produce alternative defense strategies and forces that could be compared side-by-side, that is not the way it turned out.

The most recent of these efforts have taken the form of the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and its congressionally mandated corollary, the report of the National Defense Panel (NDP).

#WARGAMING GAME CENTER LAUNCH AT START SERIES#

Since the end of the Cold War, the US Department of Defense has embarked on a series of studies andДЇorce planning efforts in an attempt to adjust its military strategies and force structure to an uncertain future. Patton, Jr.ДЇrom Parameters, Autumn 1999, pp. The Need for Joint Wargaming: Combining Theory and Practice

Wargaming game center launch at start